Legal Opinion

State v. Walston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 2014No. 392PA13PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

In this case we consider the admissibility of evidence of a pertinent character trait of a criminal defendant under North Carolina Rule of Evidence 404(a)(1). For character evidence to be admissible at trial under Rule 404(a)(1), an accused must “tailor the evidence to a particular trait that is relevant to an issue in the case.” State v. Squire, 321 N.C. 541, 546, 364 S.E.2d 354, 357 (1988). Defendant’s proffered evidence of being respectful towards children was not sufficiently tailored to the State’s charges of child sexual abuse and was thus inadmissible. Separately, we…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. SyrianiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. SteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API