Legal Opinion

State v. Goble

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1999No. 92A05-9704-CR-160PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUCKER, Judge

The State of Indiana appeals the trial court’s order granting Michael L. Goble’s motion for discharge pursuant to Ind. Crim. Rule 4(C).1 We address the following restated issue: was the delay in bringing Goble to trial within one year attributable to the State. We conclude it was not and therefore reverse.

On July 26, 1995, the State charged Goble with resisting law enforcement as a Class D felony and mistreatment of a police dog as a Class A misdemeanor. At the initial hearing counsel was appointed for Goble, and trial was scheduled for November 30,1995. Prior to trial,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Bates v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Spears v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. IsaacsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. May v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. StacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. GobleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API