May v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Adrian May brings this interlocutory appeal of the trial court's denial of his motion for discharge.
We affirm.
ISSUES
1. Whether May was entitled to discharge pursuant to Indiana Criminal Rule 4(C).
2. Whether May has been denied his right to a speedy trial.
FACTS
On July 18, 2001, in Clark Superior Court #1, 1 the State filed an information charging May with aggravated battery, a class B felony; battery, a class C felony; feticide, a class C felony; criminal recklessness, a class D felony, and intimidation, a class D felony. At the initial hearing on July…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Goudy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Wheeler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SagalovskyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005