Legal Opinion

Morris Friedman v. The United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 14, 1970No. Customs Appeal 5355PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division, 62 Cust.Ct. 252, C.D. 3737, 296 F.Supp. 346, overruling a protest to the classification of imports invoiced as “Six Ring Loose Leaf Mechanisms” and “Three Ring Loose Leaf Mechanisms.”

The mechanisms were classified under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108:

Articles or wares not specially provided for, whether partly or wholly manufactured:

Composed wholly or in chief value of iron, steel, copper, brass, nickel, pewter, zinc, aluminum, or other base metal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. APF Electronics Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API