Caughan v. Urquhart
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
We think the contention of Hale and Aycock, that the trial court erred when he overruled their "plea of privilege" and refused to transfer the case to Collin county for trial, should be sustained.
The statute provides that, except in cases it specifies, "no person who is an inhabitant of this state shall be sued out of the county in which he has his domicile." Article 1830, Vernon's Statutes. One of the excepted cases is "where there are two or more defendants residing in different counties, in which case," it is declared, "the suit may be brought in any county where any one of the defendants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ray v. W. W. Kimball Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Bledsoe v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Gambrell v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Murphy v. DabneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Eyres v. Crockett State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stockyards National Bank v. MaplesTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Neyland v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Kelly v. National Bank of DenisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.