Legal Opinion

Kelly v. National Bank of Denison

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1925No. 3032PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). If the suit was on the injunction bond, and we think it was, the pleas of privilege should not have been overruled because M. L. Kelly, Sr., resided in Dallas county, for he was not a party to the bond, therefore was not liable thereon (32 C. J. 437), and hence was neither a proper nor a necessary party to the suit. The exception (fourth) in the statute authorizing a plaintiff, where the defendants reside in different counties, to sue them in a county where one of them resides, does not apply if the defendant residing in the county where the suit is brought…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hilliard Bros. v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MangumTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Thomas Goggan & Bros. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Gorton v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Hayden v. KeithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cerf v. MingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API