Legal Opinion

Quad Cities Waterkeeper v. Ballegeer

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided March 26, 2015No. Case No. 4:12-cv-4075-SLD-JEHPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

■ SARA DARROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiffs Quad Cities Waterkeeper (“Waterkeeper”) and Prairie Rivers Network (“Prairie Rivers”) bring this action for declaratory and injunctive relief and civil penalties under the citizen suit provision of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(a)(1). Plaintiffs claim that Defendants David G. Ballegeer, Ballegeer Trucking, Inc., Ballegeer Excavating, Inc., and Francis Ballegeer have violated and continue to violate the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387, by discharging pollutants without a permit issued under the Act. Now before the Court…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elite Legacy Corporation v. SchvaneveldtCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  2. Sun State Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
  3. United States v. City of Cahokia HeightsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API