Legal Opinion
Stewart v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided January 6, 1959No. Claim No. 34753PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles T. Major, J.
The State of New York, through its Attorney-General, made a motion (No. 4862) for the dismissal of the above claim, on the ground that the notice of intention was not filed within 90 days of the accrual thereof, in accordance with section 10 of the Court of Claims Act. The claimant made a cross motion (No. 4862-A) for an order granting permission *136“ nunc pro tunc ” to the claimant to file -the claim herein, or in the alternative to deny the State’s motion to dismiss the claim herein.
This is a claim to recover damages for alleged negligence of the State, causing an automobile accident on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Psaty v. DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Psaty v. DuryeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Petzold v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1952
- Thomann v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaplan v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Conquest v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1968