Legal Opinion

In Re Hartwig's Estate

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1949No. 7581PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The testator by the plain provisions of his will only disposed of his part of the community property and thereby confined the residue referred to in paragraph 11 thereof to that portion remaining after specific bequests were paid. 69 C.J. p. 422; Davis v. Davis, 62 Ohio St. 411, 57 N.E. 317, 319, 78 Am.St.Rep. 725; Stewart v. Purget, Ohio App., 45 N.E.2d 792; In re Alabones Estate, 75 N.J.Eq. 527, 72 A. 427; Blankenbaker v. Early, 132 Va. 408,112 S.E. 599; Roy v. Monroe, 47 N.J.Eq. 356, 20 A. 481, 484.

The testator, having restricted the residuary clause to the balance of his half of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barney v. MaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Oglesbee v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Estate of ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Jones v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  5. Verhalen v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of KirkIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bruner v. CorwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Dolan v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In Re Corwin's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In Re Fletcher's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API