Legal Opinion

Van Tuyl v. Federal Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 13, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

32 N.J. Super. 406 (1954)

108 A.2d 483

WILLIAM VAN TUYL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

FEDERAL SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 4, 1954.

Decided October 13, 1954.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for petitioner-respondent.

Mr. John J. Monigan, Jr., argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Horner, attorneys; Mr. William L. Dill, Jr., of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Appeal is taken…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Donofrio v. Haag Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Bango v. WardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Lazzio v. Primo Silk Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  4. Nagle v. ConardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  5. Colbert v. Consolidated LaundryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HOWARD EX REL. HOWARD v. Harwood's Restaurant Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Fierro v. Public Service Coord. TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API