Clintonville Transfer Line, Inc. v. Public Service Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentFaiRCHIld, J.
I concur in the decision of the court in so far as it reverses the judgment of the circuit court, but am of the opinion that the mandate should direct the circuit court to confirm the order of the commission.
In determining whether a certificate of public convenience and necessity should issue, it is not just a matter of the length of a route nor that a time-saving schedule may be constructed. The question the commission must answer is: Is the public getting a service that in the commission’s opinion after a review of the evidence is sufficient?
The statute reads: “The commission shall have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. ShupeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- United Parcel Service v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Stoner v. UndersethMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- A. & T. Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.