Legal Opinion

Blashfield v. Empire State Tel. & Tel. Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by H. Wilson Blashfield, assignee, against the Empire Telephone &• Telegraph Company. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Nottingham, R.

Recovery is sought by the plaintiff in this action upon, a number of assigned claims for damages alleged to have been sustained by the owners of the fee and persons in possession of premises running to the-center of a public highway in the country by the erection and maintenance thereupon of a telephone line by the defendant. In the county of Cortland,, in the year 1884, poles were set and wires strung for a telephone from Glen Haven to Homer, through the village of Scott; and in 1887 from Preble to-Homer; and in 1890 from Homer to Truxton. The Truxton line is conceded to have…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Bloodgood v. Mohawk & Hudson RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Livingston v. MayorCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
  5. Jackson ex dem. Yates v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court · 1818

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Eels v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Moore v. N. Y. Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API