Legal Opinion

Ray-Hayes v. HEINAMANN.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 2002No. 89S05-0201-CV-306Published

1Opinion of the Court

760 N.E.2d 172 (2002)

Sheila RAY-HAYES, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Amanda K. Ray, Appellant (Plaintiff below),

v.

Ryan S. HEINAMANN, Nissan Motor Company, Ltd., Nissan North America, Inc., and Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A., Appellees (Defendants below).

No. 89S05-0201-CV-306.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

January 2, 2002.

Thomas C. Doehrman, Courtney E. McGovern, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

Wayne C. Kreuscher, Michael D. Moon, Jr., Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellees Nissan, et al.

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

2Per curiam

We grant transfer to resolve a conflict between the Court of Appeals'…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ray-Hayes v. HEINAMANN.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Fort Wayne International Airport v. WilburnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. v. Wabash Valley Refuse Removal, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ray-Hayes v. HeinamannIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API