Legal Opinion

In re Partridge's Estate

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Multnomah: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Judicial settlement of the accounts of G. M. Weister, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of E. J. Partridge, deceased, to which the M. A. Seed Dry-Plate Company filed objections.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Judicial settlement of the accounts of G. M. Weister, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of E. J. Partridge, deceased, to which the M. A. Seed Dry-Plate Company filed objections. E. J. Partridge, who was a resident of Portland, and engaged in the wholesale photographic supply business, died testate, on the - day of June, 1891. On July 7, G. M. Weister was appointed special administrator of his estate, with power to “continue the business and collect the outstanding bills as speedily as is consistent with, the good of the business.” Weister…

1Per curiam

Error is predicated of the action of the county court in two particulars: First, in the dis-allowance in part of Weister’s claim for salaries from November 1, 1892, to the date of filing his final account; and, second, in removing him as administrator, because the proceeding was not one instituted under the statute for the especial purpose, nor by citation to the administrator to show cause/ against such action.

It is shown by the evidence in the case that a con*304cern styled the “Weister-Meek Company” was formed about January 1, 1893, to engage in the same line of business as that carried on by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. May v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Steel v. HolladayOregon Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of HerbstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Hofer v. GofnerOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In Re Estate of NeilOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In re Barnes' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API