Legal Opinion

California National Bank v. Havis

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 2004No. B167152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Before escrow closed on the sale of a developed parcel of real property, California National Bank (Bank) sent a letter to the escrow agent handling the sale stating that it had received “payoff funds” for the secured promissory note that it then held. The trial court interpreted that letter as a payoff demand statement under Civil Code section 2943, 1 concluded that Bank had made a binding acknowledgement that its outstanding note had been paid off, and held that Bank’s secured interest in the property had been extinguished.

In this appeal by Bank from the resulting adverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re: Carolyn L. BurkeUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API