Bank of Commerce v. Tubb
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentHart, J.
In saying that the decisions of the court of Tennessee must govern in this case, the majority opinion proceeds upon the theory that it is a case calling for the application of the doctrine of comity.
Judge Smith and myself recognize that comity will enforce rights not in their nature local, and not contrary to the policy of the government of the tribunal.
In the application of the doctrine of comity, "the courts of this State have always enforced the rights of property arising under contracts in another State when such enforcement neither violates our own laws nor infringes on the rights of our…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Newsum v. HoffmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Reavis v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- F. E. Creelman Lumber Co. v. LeshSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Judge v. CurtisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Security Bank & Trust Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.