Legal Opinion

Liberty Oil Co. v. Joy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1933No. 14243PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

We are called upon to construe a clause contained in a written lease and to determine whether the said clause placed upon the tenant the obligation of paying certain paving charges levied upon the leased property. The said clause required that the tenant should pay “⅜ * * All federal, state, parish, city, drainage and any other taxes or assessments that may be lawfully levied by any taxing authority against the property herein leased.”

For a full statement of the controversy see the original opinion rendered by us in this matter, 147 So. 375.

The liquidators of the former tenant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Shepardson v. ElmoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Cerny v. Jednota Cesky DamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  4. Liberty Oil Co. v. JoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co. v. Northwestern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. JoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1983
  3. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. JoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API