Legal Opinion · Dissent

Huston v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1990No. C-8147Published

1DissentHecht, Justice

I agree with the rule the Court announces for appealing orders in receiver-ships. I do not agree, however, either as a rule or in this case, that the creditors of a failed bank should be denied interest on their claims prior to a distribution of any surplus to the bank’s stockholders. Accordingly, I dissent.

The Court gives two reasons for concluding that the FDIC is not entitled to interest on its claims against the Bank of Woodson prior to payment of stockholder claims. The first is that article 342-804a, Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated (Vernon Supp.1990),1 which establishes payment…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. National Bank of the Commonwealth v. Mechanics' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Ticonic National Bank v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. Castro AlfaroTexas Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API