Commonwealth v. Hancharik
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
On this appeal, we are asked to determine whether spousal incompetency to testify to confidential communications under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5914 is removed by virtue of the excep*339tions to such incompetency set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 5913. We hold that it is. Since this case involved violence done upon a minor child in the care or temporary custody of the defendant/husband, an enumerated exception found in § 5913, the wife was a competent witness against her husband. There being no merit, therefore, in the defendant/husband’s assertion on appeal that defense trial counsel was ineffective…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Commonwealth v. RoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. HessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HancharikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. HatfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Com. v. Brown, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Scott, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. HancharikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.