Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hancharik

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1989No. 121PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

On this appeal, we are asked to determine whether spousal incompetency to testify to confidential communications under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5914 is removed by virtue of the excep*339tions to such incompetency set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 5913. We hold that it is. Since this case involved violence done upon a minor child in the care or temporary custody of the defendant/husband, an enumerated exception found in § 5913, the wife was a competent witness against her husband. There being no merit, therefore, in the defendant/husband’s assertion on appeal that defense trial counsel was ineffective…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. DurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. RoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. HessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HancharikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. HatfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Com. v. Brown, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Scott, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Commonwealth v. HancharikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API