Legal Opinion
People v. Doty
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 1985No. B004791PublishedCited by 5 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
This is an appeal challenging a conviction for violating Penal Code section 496—receiving stolen property. The appellant raises two central issues on appeal. First, did the trial court err in denying the appellant’s Penal Code section 1538.5 motion to suppress physical evidence and statements made by the appellant. Second, did the police err when they failed to give the appellant Miranda warnings at the scene of the crime. Because we find no error, we affirm.
I. Facts and Proceedings Below
On September 1, 1983, Officer Michael Keller of the Los Angeles Police Department…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Terry York Imports, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Christians v. ChesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. CalvertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. RomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. PotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005