Legal Opinion
People v. Roman
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1991No. B048700PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE (S. J.), P. J.
The issue presented is whether either Vehicle Code section 2805 or the landlord’s consent to enter the leased premises satisfied the People’s burden of justifying a warrantless search and seizure. We find that neither ground asserted justified the search and seizure and affirm the order of dismissal.
The People appeal, pursuant to Penal Code section 1238, subdivision (a)(7), from a dismissal on the court’s motion based on an order suppressing evidence under Penal Code section 1538.5. 1
Defendants Jose Ornelas Roman and Roberto Pacheco were charged with one count of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- United States v. Leamon Lee CroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. CalvertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. PotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005