Legal Opinion

Hegarty v. Luff

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 17, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 1993-57PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Eugene D. Hegarty, has brought suit against three defendants for the payment of an arbitrator’s fee. The three defendants are Morris Luff of Washington, D. C., Willard J. Luff, who resides in Maryland and who is employed in Pennsylvania, and John W. Slacks of Arizona. The defendant, Morris Luff, was served personally within this jurisdiction.

Upon motion of the plaintiff, summary judgment was entered by the Court in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Morris Luff in the amount of $6,378, said sum to be paid to the plaintiff from a fund of $20,000…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Vidal v. South American Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  3. Ladew v. Tennessee Copper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1910
  4. Dan Cohen Realty Co. v. National Savings & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Dan Cohen Realty Co. v. National Savings & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newton v. Inter-American, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API