Legal Opinion

Heiple v. C.R. Motors, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1995No. 808PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, Judge:

In this appeal from the trial court’s denial of its preliminary objections, 1 appellant General Motors Corporation asks us to revisit our decision in Gingold v. Audi-NSU-Auto Union, A.G., 389 Pa.Super. 328, 567 A.2d 312 (1989), reargument denied, February 20, 1990. Appellant argues that Pokorny v. Ford Motor Co., 902 F.2d 1116 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 853, 111 S.Ct. 147, 112 L.Ed.2d 113 (1990), in which the Third Circuit Court of Appeals declined to follow Gingold, compels us to overrule it. We disagree, finding instead that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PleasantIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bunt v. Pension Mortgage Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Cellucci v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Muntz v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Courtney v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API