Legal Opinion

Marker v. Marker

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 12, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This bill is by a husband against his wife for an accounting. There can be no serious doubt that the source of the wife's accumulation, and it is considerable, was the husband's weekly wage, turned over to her during a period of nineteen years, and $2,000, proceeds of building and loan shares, and other lump sums. He says that he gave it into her care to save for their old age upon a share and share alike basis; "fifty-fifty," as he put it. The agreement finds support in the fact that the first five mortgage investments, and later a sixth, were taken by her in their joint names, and in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGee v. McGeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Gorrell v. GorrellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  3. Beck v. BeckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  4. Farrow v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. MeyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  2. Gentile v. GentileNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API