Legal Opinion
Lee v. Rudd
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1923PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.
This is a negligence action. Plaintiff was seriously injured. Defendant’s attorney recognized the grave character of the case, and negotiations for settlement were instituted. Plaintiff demanded more than the defendant was willing to pay. Finally the case went on the day calendar for the last day of the Onondaga January Trial Term. It was not reached, and remained on the first day’s calendar of the February term. Defendant resides in Schenectady. On the Saturday prior to the opening of the February term defendant’s attorneys sent for their client, but instead of coming to Syracuse himself, he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vose v. . CockcroftNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- People v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Potter v. RossiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Zwecker v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Smith v. BachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Countryman v. BreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Langlois v. LangloisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Gass v. AronsNew York City Court · 1928
- In re the Estate of GardinerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.