Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anna Miller v. Office of Personnel Management

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 8, 2006No. 05-3358Published

1DissentDyk, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) lacks jurisdiction to determine whether the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) improperly deducted amounts for life insurance from the petitioner’s annuity payments. In my view the majority opinion rests on a misunderstanding of the 1978 Civil Service Reform Act (“CSRA”), Pub.L. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111 et seq., and of the limited provision for court jurisdiction over life insurance claims enacted in 1954 and now appearing in 5 U.S.C. § 8715.

I

Before the CSRA legislation of 1978, claims for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Drg Funding Corporation v. Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API