Legal Opinion
Bynum v. Rucker
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 17, 1938No. 6 Div. 230PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Bill in equity by purchaser of real estate to rescind for fraud.
Complainant had purchased the mineral interest in a 60-acre tract of land, paying $900 cash therefor.
The specific averments of fraud are:
“That in the negotiations leading up to said contract the respondent, I. N. Rucker, fraudulently 'represented to the complaihant that there was in and under said land great quantities of valuable ore known as manganese ore; and that said manga7 nese ore was four feet thick and of high grade, and complainant, on said representations, relying and acting on the truthfulness of said…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,189 First Virginia Bankshares v. Alan BensonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Ex Parte LumpkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- First Alabama Bank Of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- ARMY AVIATION CTR. FED. CREDIT U. v. PostonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Lucky Mfg. Co. v. Activation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.