Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Bass Furn. & Carpet Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1926No. 16418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEY, C.

The defendant. Bass Furniture & Carpet Company, had been occupying a store building belonging to the plaintiff for eight or nine years, under. a written contract. At the time the defendant moved into the store building, there were shelving and offices, and the contract provided that the building should be left in as good condition as it then was, wear and tear excepted. The defendant moved into the building and put in some additional shelving and rooms, in order to display their goods and wares. They also tore out the offices that were in said building and moved them to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Felcher v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Field v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Collamore v. GillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Incorporated Town of Pittsburg v. CochraneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Kay County Gas Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Carte-Caldwell v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Irwin v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API