Legal Opinion

Incorporated Town of Pittsburg v. Cochrane

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1945No. 31467PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

On January 16, 1942, H. A. Ellis, individually and in behalf of all others similarly situated, commenced this action in Pittsburg county against E. J. Cochrane to enjoin him from interfering with the water system and service of the town of Pittsburg.

The town of Pittsburg was granted leave to intervene and the sheriff and treasurer of Pittsburg county were made additional parties defendant.

In its amended intervening petition the town of Pittsburg alleged it was a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Oklahoma;' that as such it had an interest in the subject of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cedar Rapids Water Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Elerick v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. City of Wilson v. WeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Florida Power Corp. v. City of Winter ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Incorporated Town of Pittsburg v. CochraneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Village of Lapwai v. AlligierIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Wichita Finance & Thrift Company v. City of LawtonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Sewerage District No. One of Rapides Parish v. Afco Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API