Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Hofmayer Dry Goods Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 24, 1924No. 4 Div. 117PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

If there was error in sustaining plaintiffs (appellee’s) demurrer to defendants’ plea numbered 2, it was harmless for the reason that defendants had full advantage of the same defense under other special pleas.

Defendants were sued as indorsers of two promissory notes executed by the Metcalf Company, a corporation, and payable to plaintiff. The Metcalf Company was indebted to plaintiff in an amount long past due, and the notes in suit were given to close the account and extend the time of payment. These appellants defended on 'the ground that, after the transaction, in the course of which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richardson Bros. & Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Futvoye v. ChuitesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Reese v. MacKentepeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Malone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Singer Sewing MacH. Co. v. HayesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Stewart v. ClemensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API