Legal Opinion

Bumpus v. Lyon

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 14, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

The plaintiff in an action against the defendant for personal injuries received in an automobile accident won a verdict for $3500. The case is now before this court on the defendant’s general motion for a new trial and on a special motion based on newly discovered evidence. As the special motion must be sustained, we shall not discuss the other.

The plaintiff was injured November 2, 1932. After the accident she was able to walk, and in fact did not consult a doctor until the next morning, who found that she had some pain in-her back and that her nose was injured slightly. He treated the nose…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nathan M. Rodman Co. v. KostisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  2. Parsons v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
  3. Gilpatrick v. ChamberlainSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boise Payette Lumber Co. v. Idaho Gold Dredging Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Boisvert v. CharestSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API