Legal Opinion

Boisvert v. Charest

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 23, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

On March 21, 1936, the complainant, seventeen years old, was delivered of a child. Eleven days previously she had sworn out a bastardy complaint against this respondent. Jury tried, he was adjudged to be its father. He attacks the verdict both by general and special motions, the latter based on alleged newly discovered evidence.

*221 General Motion

We are satisfied that the verdict should not be overturned on this motion. Even would this Court have come to a different conclusion in the first instance, we can not say that the jury was not warranted in returning its verdict. Foster v. Eastern Trust &…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bolduc v. GarcelonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  2. Nathan M. Rodman Co. v. KostisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  3. Cobb v. CogswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  4. Kimball v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  5. State v. SheaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CasaleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  2. Hunter v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  3. Bean v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API