Boisvert v. Charest
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.
On March 21, 1936, the complainant, seventeen years old, was delivered of a child. Eleven days previously she had sworn out a bastardy complaint against this respondent. Jury tried, he was adjudged to be its father. He attacks the verdict both by general and special motions, the latter based on alleged newly discovered evidence.
*221 General Motion
We are satisfied that the verdict should not be overturned on this motion. Even would this Court have come to a different conclusion in the first instance, we can not say that the jury was not warranted in returning its verdict. Foster v. Eastern Trust &…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bolduc v. GarcelonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
- Nathan M. Rodman Co. v. KostisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Cobb v. CogswellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
- Kimball v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
- State v. SheaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CasaleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- Hunter v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Bean v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008