Legal Opinion

Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Broadhead

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1924No. 6 Div. 906PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Where the owner of the entire estate in land conveys the surface, but retains the minerals — the grantee taking possession of the land, and occupying and using it as his own under the grant, and there being no physical severance of the minerals by any one — the possession of the minerals follows the possession of the surface, and the surface owner holds possession of the minerals for the benefit of the owner in that right. Moore v. Empire Land Co., 181 Ala. 344, 61 South. 940.

In such a ease the surface owner may be said to be a quasi bailee of the mineral owner (Christopher v. C. A. Lumber…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kidd v. BorumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Hooper v. Bankhead & BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Kidd v. BrowneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Fielder v. ChildsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Blakeney v. DuboseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Clanahan v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. CARLISLE v. Federal Land BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Buckelew v. YawkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API