Legal Opinion

United States v. Sykes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 26, 2011No. 10-50399PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge:

Jerome Sykes appeals from the district court’s denial in part of his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). He contends that the district court’s modification of his sentence to the 120-month mandatory minimum term pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) constituted the application of a new sentence, in violation of Dillon v. United States, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010), and that the sentence the court ordered violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We affirm because we…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Owen DunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Yale AugustineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Timothy YazzieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Charles LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Deon CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API