United States v. Sykes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge:
Jerome Sykes appeals from the district court’s denial in part of his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). He contends that the district court’s modification of his sentence to the 120-month mandatory minimum term pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) constituted the application of a new sentence, in violation of Dillon v. United States, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010), and that the sentence the court ordered violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We affirm because we…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Owen DunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Yale AugustineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Timothy YazzieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Charles LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Deon CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.