Legal Opinion

Ulster Electric Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The letter, dated November 16, 1967, sent by the plaintiff to the defendant general contractor — in which it announced that “ [w]e are therefore proceeding with a lien against [the] job ” —may not be regarded as the notice which section 137 of the State Finance Law requires as a condition precedent to an action on the general contractor’s payment bond by a person who furnishes materials to a subcontractor. We pass on no other question.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. ZukovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. State v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Great Lakes Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Camful Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Vigliarolo Bros. v. Lanza Contracting Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985