Legal Opinion
Ulster Electric Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The letter, dated November 16, 1967, sent by the plaintiff to the defendant general contractor — in which it announced that “ [w]e are therefore proceeding with a lien against [the] job ” —may not be regarded as the notice which section 137 of the State Finance Law requires as a condition precedent to an action on the general contractor’s payment bond by a person who furnishes materials to a subcontractor. We pass on no other question.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. ZukovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- State v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Great Lakes Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Camful Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Vigliarolo Bros. v. Lanza Contracting Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985