Legal Opinion

DiNatale v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 25, 1987No. 485-86TPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

Pro se plaintiff Antoinette DiNatale is before this court requesting “judgment against the United States for 1978 taxes of $1,666 plus penalties and interest to date and for the year 1977 taxes of $19,018 plus penalties and interest to date.” Defendant has moved for dismissal of the action be*73cause this court lacks jurisdiction over the plaintiffs claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1491. The defendant’s motion is granted.

FACTS

At issue in this case are joint federal income tax returns for 1977 and 1978 filed by plaintiff Antoinette DiNatale and her husband, James, who is now…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Saunooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  4. GreenUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Frise v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Sig and Barbara Shore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Skillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Katz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API