Legal Opinion

Tel-Ads, Inc. v. Trans-Lux Playhouse, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 20, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 68-64PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s claim, defendant’s counterclaim, and defendant’s third party claim against third party defendant came on to be heard before the Court sitting without a jury. Upon consideration of the briefs submitted by all parties both before and after the trial, and the evidence presented and arguments made in open court, the Court has reached the following conclusions, which shall be considered as findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the business of promoting, publishing,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drazin v. Jack Pry, IncorporatedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Jack Pry, Incorporated v. DrazinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Crane v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1918
  4. Crook v. International Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Insurance Management of Washington, Inc. v. Eno & Howard Plumbing Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Wagshal v. SeligDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. A-J Marine, Inc. v. Corfu Contractors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. In re the Arbitration between Mostek Corp. & North American Foreign Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. A-J Marine, Inc. v. Corfu Contractors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API