Lindy v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtBeNNett, Judge
This suit for refund of an FHA inspection fee comes before the court on defendant’s motion and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment. A provision of the National Housing Act of 1934, as amended and printed at 12 U.S.C. § 1713(d) (1970), reads in part: “* * * ;[T]he Secretary [of HUD] is authorized to charge and collect such amounts as he may deem reasonable for the appraisal of a property or project offered for insurance [i.e., FHA insurance of the mortgage] and for the inspection of such property or project during construction * * A regulation promulgated thereunder, relating to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- American Guaranty Corporation and Harry H. Burton, Receiver v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Terminal Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Carol D. Heers, Harold W. Heers, and Charles M. Heers, Trading as Heers Associates, a California Partnership v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- D & L Construction Co. & Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- El Dorado Springs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- United States v. BurnsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981