Legal Opinion

Lindy v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 15, 1976No. 101-75PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeNNett, Judge

This suit for refund of an FHA inspection fee comes before the court on defendant’s motion and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment. A provision of the National Housing Act of 1934, as amended and printed at 12 U.S.C. § 1713(d) (1970), reads in part: “* * * ;[T]he Secretary [of HUD] is authorized to charge and collect such amounts as he may deem reasonable for the appraisal of a property or project offered for insurance [i.e., FHA insurance of the mortgage] and for the inspection of such property or project during construction * * A regulation promulgated thereunder, relating to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. American Guaranty Corporation and Harry H. Burton, Receiver v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Terminal Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Carol D. Heers, Harold W. Heers, and Charles M. Heers, Trading as Heers Associates, a California Partnership v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. D & L Construction Co. & Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. El Dorado Springs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. United States v. BurnsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API