In Re the Claims of Di Martino
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, in each of these cases.
Whether the relationships of the bundle-haulers and the motor route carriers with the publishers are those of employees or independent contractors involves resolution of questions of fact. We agree with the Appellate Division that in each case, taken as a whole the proof in the record constituted substantial evidence sustaining the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that the relationship was that of employer-employee.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges…
2Cited by32 opinions
- In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re the Claim of RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re the Claim of MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lane v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.