Legal Opinion
State v. Stump
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1943No. 28806PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
— On February 27, 1942, Lilly Stump and Clyde Nunn were, by an information filed by the prosecuting attorney of Snohomish county, jointly charged with a violation of Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), §§ 7306-92A and 7306-93 [P. C. §§ 3180-102 and 3180-103], as follows:
“That the said Lilly Stump and Clyde Nunn, in the county of Snohomish, state of Washington, on or about the 20th day of February, 1942, wilfully and unlawfully did keep and have in their possession, intoxicating liquor, to-wit: whiskey, on premises conducted and maintained by them as principal or agent, with intent to sell the same.
“And…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Levell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Edelstein v. HunekeWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State ex rel. Lockmiller v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Seattle v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. SaywardWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. GairnsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.