Legal Opinion

State v. Kirkpatrick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1935No. 25295. En BancPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an information containing three counts, defendant was charged with the crimes (1) of burglary in the second degree, (2) of grand larceny, and (3) of being an habitual criminal. He was tried on all three counts at the same time, was found guilty on all three, and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals, assigning error in the following particulars: The joining in the same information of the charge of being an habitual criminal with the charges of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny; and the presentation of all three offenses to a jury in a single trial.

[1] The question has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FerroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. People v. . SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. State v. FindlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Maguire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  5. State Ex Rel. Edelstein v. HunekeWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. AlexisWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. FurthWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State v. Vernell Teynac HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Harrison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API