Legal Opinion

People v. Pavlisak, Jones

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judgments should be affirmed on the ground that there was no prejudicial error in the charge as to reasonable doubt when read in its entirety or in any other rulings of the trial court to which exceptions were taken. We may not consider rulings to which no exceptions were taken. (People v. Cummins, 209 N. Y. 283; People v. Pindar, 210 N. Y. 191.)

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur; Conway, J., dissents in the following memorandum in which Rippey, J., concurs:

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. . CumminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. People v. . PindarNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SciasciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. People v. BordonabaNew York Supreme Court · 1970