State v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ROTH, Judge:
{1 Richard L. Moore appeals from his conviction for sexual abuse of a child, a see-ond degree felony, see Utah Code Aun. § 76-5-404.1(2)-(8) (2008). 1 Moore argues that the trial court plainly erred in admitting out-of-court statements that he claims were hearsay and that trial counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to object to the admission of that hearsay evidence. Moore also contends that there was insufficient evidence to convict him. We affirm.
T2 "On appeal, we recite the facts in the light most favorable to the jury's verdict." State v. Burk, 839…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KelleyUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Love v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- State v. Martinez-CastellanosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.