Legal Opinion
De Poalo v. County of Schenectady
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mercure, J.
The petitioner in each of these proceedings is a correction officer employed by respondent County of Schenectady who filed an application for benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c as the result of an alleged illness incurred in the course of his employment. Petitioner Philip De Poalo suffered chest pain on November 20, 1991 and was hospitalized for approximately five days. He supported his application for benefits with a letter from his personal physician indicating that De Poalo suffered from unstable angina pectoris and an occluded right coronary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crawford v. Sheriff's DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Schenectady County Sheriff's Benevolent Ass'n v. McEvoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kirley v. Department of FireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Schenectady Police Benevolent Ass'n v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hamilton v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re the Arbitration between Barnes & Council 82, AFSCMEAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Fasanaro v. County of RocklandNew York Supreme Court · 1995
- Meyers v. LoughrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- White v. County of CortlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.