Red River Freethinkers v. City of Fargo
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
The Red River Freethinkers oppose a Ten Commandments monument in Fargo, North Dakota. The district court1 found the monument permissible under the Establishment Clause. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
*949The monument here is essentially the same as those in Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677, 125 S.Ct. 2854, 162 L.Ed.2d 607 (2005), and ACLU Nebraska Foundation v. City of Plattsmouth, Nebraska, 419 F.3d 772 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc). It was donated by the Fraternal Order of Eagles in 1958. It sits passively on the Civic Plaza. It shows the Ten…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pleasant Grove City v. SummumSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- James F. HUTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Van Orden v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liguria Foods, Inc. v. Griffith Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2017
- New Doe Child 1 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Connellsville Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015