Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 2, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 28, 1998, which ruled that claimant was *559disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

The record demonstrates that claimant, a truck driver, was offered his choice of three delivery assignments. Claimant advised the employer that he did not wish to accept any of the offered assignments because he would not have enough time to attend a co-worker’s grievance hearing, even though claimant’s presence had not been requested by either the employer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RulkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of EstremeraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. In re the Claim of HirschfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GramonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of GoodrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of CannavinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. In re the Claim of GasconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API