Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Hidalgo & Cameron Counties Water Control & Improvement District Number Nine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 24, 1958No. 13412PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Hidalgo and Cameron Counties Water Control and Improvement District Number Nine sued and recovered a judgment for debt against H. L. Hansen and Harold Hansen in the amount of $765.04. Plansens pleaded that the debt was barred by the two-year statute of limitations, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 5526, but the trial court held that the contract between the parties was in writing and that it was subject to the four-year statute of limitations, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 5527. The trial court also held that, in any event, the suit was brought within two years.

Plaintiff is a municipal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hines v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Texas Western Railway Co. v. GentryTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cavitt v. AmslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Cowart v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Parks v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Godde v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Cox v. DavisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API