Hansen v. Hidalgo & Cameron Counties Water Control & Improvement District Number Nine
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Hidalgo and Cameron Counties Water Control and Improvement District Number Nine sued and recovered a judgment for debt against H. L. Hansen and Harold Hansen in the amount of $765.04. Plansens pleaded that the debt was barred by the two-year statute of limitations, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 5526, but the trial court held that the contract between the parties was in writing and that it was subject to the four-year statute of limitations, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 5527. The trial court also held that, in any event, the suit was brought within two years.
Plaintiff is a municipal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hines v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Texas Western Railway Co. v. GentryTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Cavitt v. AmslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Cowart v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Parks v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Godde v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Cox v. DavisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964