Charpentier v. Bresnahan
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Russell, J.) . Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts .are stated in the head-note.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
There is only one question in this case presented to our consideration.
Mederick W. Charpentier was engaged in the grocery business in the city of Muskegon. He had no other business, and no other stock in trade except that in his grocery store.
The defendant, as sherifE of the county of Muskegon, levied upon his entire stock of goods, with several executions, aggregating about $700 in amount. The stock and ■fixtures so levied upon were worth $545.
After the levy, Charpentier, at the request of one of the ■execution creditors, signed and delivered to the sheriff, or ■one of the creditors, a paper…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re National Grocer Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Betz v. BrennerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Boyle v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Box v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894