Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Schwenke

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1993No. 900136, 910095PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

In this disciplinary matter, we are asked to approve the petition of the Utah State Bar to disbar attorney A. Paul Schwenke from the practice of law in Utah. The Bar’s petition is grounded in findings and recommendations of a special master appointed by the Bar. For the reasons stated below, we deny the petition.

Because these proceedings were protracted over several years and involved unrelated disciplinary matters that were consolidated for the purpose of the recommendation for disbarment, a rather lengthy introduction is in order.

CASE NO. F-241

Schwenke has been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re CalderUtah Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In Re the Discipline of SonnenreichUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Long v. ETHICS AND DISCIPLINE COMMITTEEUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Rose v. Office of Prof'l ConductUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. HuntzingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API