Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1924No. 1802PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

The Court of Appeals having in all respects affirmed the judgment of the court of common pleas, this error proceeding in this court brings in review the question of the soundness of the judgment of the court of common pleas, and that judgment must be the basis of our inquiry.

Counsel for the tax commission, adopting this view of the matter, have made three principal assignments of error:

First. That the court of common pleas did not; render a final judgment or find the true value in! money of the company’s property in Ohio and that: it was error to remand the cause to the tax com-: mission for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. West v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Fargo v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Stanton v. State Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. National Tube Co. v. AyresOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Pennsylvania Rd. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API